Crimson
Posted 14/11/2008 @ 10:02

Ouch Mark Latham, you should shut up, I would like to see your reply to "Propet" comment blow. Think he made you look like a fool. And just coz we South Africans thrashed you in the last Rugby game doesnt mean our refs suck. Just means we started playing as a team. And Enlgand is gonna take you out tommorow , Sheridan will make your forwards squeem.

Crimson
Posted 14/11/2008 @ 07:26

Aussies to crush South Africa 3-0 in Australia, might be a different story in South Africa. And I am a South African, its just everytime we go to Aus we are fill of confidence, they will bring us back to earth.

Crimson
Posted 12/11/2008 @ 14:23

Shifter, I hate to disagree with you bat your captain can make the team play better, not necessarilly with inspiration. Grame Smith can hit a hundred and take the pressure of the next batsmen or when Pollock was captain he could take a few wicket putting more pressure on the rest of the batsmen thus enabling Ntini to take wickets through pressure Pollock applied. Does anyone agree since Pollock left Ntini has been average. Anyway a captain can bring the best out of his team by the way he leads if he himself fails it makes it difficult for the rest of the team.

Crimson
Posted 08/09/2008 @ 09:35

lol at brilliant article, pity Swam doesnt see the liter side of the article.

Crimson
Posted 29/08/2008 @ 14:40

Lol looks like ed changes all profound language to idiot

Pom_in_Pretoria says...

Prophet...wasn't Gambhir's ridiculous appeal based on his need to retaliate for Watson's alleged profanities?...so there is one instance. I think that the Indians have a problem in differentiating between the sort of sledging ...

Have Your Say
columnists

Columnists In his latest skysports.com blog, Ryan Sidebottom insists spirits are still high in the England squad despite a poor start to their tour...

"The fours count at Indore was a nerve-shredding (and almost wallet-emptying) 25-24 in India's favour; the sixes 7-6. So where did the decisive runs come from?"